Blog

A highways perspective on cross-sector competition for infrastructure skills

A closer look at where cross-sector demand for specialist infrastructure skills could affect highways delivery, drawing on our newly-published review of supply chain readiness for National Highways’ RIS3 programme.

  • July 2026
  • 6 minutes
  • Client: National Highways, Office of Rail and Road
  • Sector: Highways, Infrastructure, Transport

Cover photo © Copyright Lewis Clarke and licensed for reuse under a cc-by-sa/2.0 Creative Commons Licence. This image has been modified.

The UK is entering a busy period for infrastructure delivery. The roads, water and energy sectors are all moving through major investment cycles. Each sector has its own policy objectives and delivery model, but will draw on overlapping skills, suppliers and materials.

As investment accelerates to meet the UK economy's needs, infrastructure delivery bodies will need to maintain a strong focus on shared risks, including competition for specialist skills and resources across sectors. This raises an important question:

As infrastructure investment scales to 2030 and beyond, where are sectors competing for the same skills, and what could that mean for delivery?

Our latest report for National Highways and the Office of Rail and Road (ORR), prepared by CEPA with Elliott Asset Management (EAM), assessed the readiness of National Highways' supply chain to deliver the third Road Investment Strategy (RIS3, covering 2026-31). This blog focuses on one finding from our report: where growing demand for transferable infrastructure skills could affect highways supply chain delivery readiness.

Informed by comprehensive supplier engagement, we found that highways suppliers were broadly confident in delivering RIS3 and tended to see competition for resources with other infrastructure sectors as a secondary risk overall, but concerns were sharper in roles with transferable skills.

Highways suppliers see the strongest skills competition with water and electricity

Our research combined a supplier survey with interviews and workshops involving National Highways, major suppliers and organisations across wider infrastructure sectors.

Surveyed highways suppliers most often pointed to water and electricity as providing the greatest competition with RIS3 for skills and resources. This is notable because more respondents work in other transport sectors, including other roads and rail, than in water or electricity.

This suggests that the greatest skills pressure may come not from the markets highways suppliers know best, but from sectors with both major investment programmes and demand for similar specialist capabilities.

Where highways suppliers see the greatest competition for skills Dot chart comparing the sectors surveyed highways suppliers work in with the sectors they expect to compete most with RIS3 for skills and resources
Figure 1: Comparison of the sectors that surveyed highways suppliers work within and those they expect to compete most with RIS3 for skills and resources. Source: CEPA-EAM analysis of National Highways supplier web survey responses.

These findings align with the wider investment picture. AMP8, covering 2025-30, is the English and Welsh water sector's largest ever investment round. Total expenditure allowances determined by Ofwat are 71% higher than for AMP7, and funding described as new investment is expected to quadruple.1 Similarly, the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) estimates that achieving clean power by 2030 will require annual capital investment of around four times the 2020-24 average in real terms.2

Overlapping skills demand is focused on specific parts of the highways supply chain

Our study points to the strongest cross-sector demand being for civils, technology, and professional and design services. These areas rely on engineering, electrical, digital, design and project management skills that are also in demand across energy, water and transport. This overlap could constrain delivery.

Suppliers also identified structures, tunnels, joints and waterproofing as exposed because they rely on transferable engineering skills. More highways-specific work, such as pavement and traffic management, appears less exposed to cross-sector skills competition. However, suppliers still reported recruitment challenges for some operational roles, particularly night-shift work.

Which parts of the RIS3 supply chain are most likely to be impacted by shared demand for skills? Diagram ranking six RIS3 supply chain categories from low to high relative exposure to cross-sector competition for skills
Figure 2: Exposure of RIS3 supply chain categories to cross-sector competition for skills (low to high exposure). Source: CEPA-EAM analysis of supplier web survey responses and supplier interviews.

Evidence from other sectors supports this picture. DESNZ's latest assessment of renewable electricity supply chain readiness identifies engineering, design, electrical and other skilled trades as areas at risk of shortage for clean power delivery.3

This assesses exposure to skills pressure rather than overall delivery risk. Our full report considers wider readiness risks and notes that National Highways already has measures in place to manage resource pressures. For RIS3, the challenge is more likely to be recruitment and retention among appointed suppliers than upfront market participation.

The Competition and Markets Authority's (CMA's) recent UK-wide study of the road and rail civil engineering market also points to a link between skills, pipeline certainty and investment. It notes that skills-shortage vacancies across the civil engineering sector rose to 5,900 in 2024, up 84% from 2022.4 The CMA also notes that uncertain future work can discourage investment in skills, capacity and innovation. Suppliers in our research made similar points, linking visibility of the three-to-five-year pipeline to recruitment, training and investment decisions. As one supplier noted:

'Companies will allocate capital to the most attractive markets with the best visibility and commitment.'
- Large highways supplier

Regional labour markets may face uneven pressure

Geography matters too. Planned Scheme Delivery Framework 2 (SDF2) activity, which spans RIS3 and RIS4, is expected to be spread fairly evenly across England. By contrast, published evidence suggests energy skills growth and AMP8 water investment may be more concentrated in the South and East. This means pressures could affect recruitment, retention or mobilisation in particular places, rather than uniformly.

Where might regional competition for infrastructure skills be greatest?
Highways: SDF2 lot values are broadly distributed across England Map of England showing the regional distribution of SDF2 lot values
Proportion of total SDF2 lot values by region (%)
Energy: growth in clean energy skills demand is focused in the East Map of England showing forecast direct clean energy jobs growth by region by 2030
Forecasted direct clean energy jobs growth by 2030 split by region, growth versus 2023
Water: planned investment is concentrated in the South East Map of England showing PR24 AMP8 water expenditure by region
Proportion of Ofwat final determinations for PR24, AMP8 total expenditure by region (%)

Figure 3: Comparison of England regional intensity out to 2030 by sector based on official expenditure and employment estimates, highways versus energy and water CEPA-EAM analysis of official published estimates from National Highways, DESNZ and Ofwat.5

RIS3 suppliers remain confident amid the risks

Highways suppliers reported medium to high readiness across the six supply chain categories considered in our report. There was also strong supplier interest in RIS3, including expected take-up of SDF2 and other procurement routes.

National Highways has already taken steps that our report identifies as supportive of delivery confidence. These include the longer eight-year SDF2, strengthened performance-related workshare, and centralised advance procurement for roadside technology components.

As infrastructure investment accelerates, effective coordination across sectors will become increasingly important. Our full report sets out five recommendation areas to support delivery through RIS3 and future investment periods, including opportunities for greater cross-sector coordination on skills, suppliers and critical materials.

'Now that the UK infrastructure pipeline has been mapped to 2030, there is a clear need for greater co-ordination across infrastructure sectors to identify where collaboration and/or phasing can reduce pressure on suppliers, skills and materials, and improve delivery confidence.'
- CEPA and EAM

The report also suggests National Highways could work with the Department for Transport to explore closer coordination with non-transport sectors, supported by a central coordinating body such as the National Infrastructure and Service Transformation Authority (NISTA).

Read the report at ORR.

Sources and notes

  

  1. Ofwat, PR24 final determinations: expenditure allowances, V2; and Ofwat, Ofwat approves £104bn upgrade to accelerate delivery of cleaner rivers and seas and secure long-term drinking water supplies for customers.
  2. Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, Clean Power 2030 Action Plan: A new era of clean electricity – main report, GOV.UK.
  3. Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, UK renewables deployment supply chain readiness study: 2026 update, GOV.UK.
  4. Competition and Markets Authority, Civil engineering market study: final report, May 2026, GOV.UK.
  5. Compiled from published Scheme Delivery Framework 2 tender documentation, the DESNZ Clean Energy Jobs Plan 2025, and Ofwat PR24 expenditure allowances. Highways and water investment has been allocated approximately based on area overlap between sector-specific regional categorisations and NUTS1 regions. For water only, London and the South East are considered a single region given the prevalence of a single supplier, Thames Water, in these regions.

To find out more, please contact our experts listed below.

Tom Fletcher
Managing Consultant United Kingdom